Octree vs Overleaf
Jul 29, 2025

LaTeX editing has come a long way from the days of wrestling with complex syntax and endless compilation errors. With the rise of AI-powered writing assistants, two platforms are leading the charge in making academic writing more accessible: Octree and Overleaf. Both promise to revolutionize how researchers, academics, and students approach LaTeX document creation, but they take distinctly different approaches.
In this comprehensive comparison, we'll dive deep into both platforms, examining their features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you choose the right tool for your academic writing needs.
What is Octree?
Octree is a relatively new player in the LaTeX editing space, currently in beta. It positions itself as "the intelligent LaTeX editor that makes academic writing feel natural and effortless." The platform's core philosophy revolves around eliminating the traditional pain points of LaTeX by integrating AI assistance directly into the writing process.
Octree's clean, modern interface emphasizes simplicity and AI integration
Key Philosophy: Stop copying LaTeX code—write and compile with AI assistance instead.
What is Overleaf?
Overleaf, on the other hand, is the established giant in the online LaTeX editing world. With over 20 million users, it's trusted by top research institutions and Fortune 500 companies around the world. It's been the go-to collaborative LaTeX platform for years, recently enhanced with AI features through its Writefull integration.
Key Philosophy: A comprehensive, mature platform that combines traditional LaTeX power with modern collaborative features and AI enhancements.
Feature Comparison
AI-Powered Writing Assistance
Feature | Octree | Overleaf |
---|---|---|
AI Assistant | Octra - Built-in AI that answers LaTeX questions and improves text | AI Assist add-on with Writefull integration |
Text Improvement | Select text + ⌘B for AI improvements | Context-aware suggestions for grammar, spelling, word choice |
LaTeX Code Generation | AI-powered LaTeX writing | TeXGPT generates tables, figures, formulas within LaTeX source code |
Language Feedback | Basic AI assistance (free tier) | Advanced English language edits tailored to academic writing |
Error Assistance | Not specified | LaTeX error assistance to identify and fix coding errors |
Winner: Overleaf takes the lead here with its mature Writefull integration, offering more comprehensive AI features and proven track record.
Collaboration Features
Feature | Octree | Overleaf |
---|---|---|
Real-time Collaboration | Coming soon | Full real-time collaboration with track changes |
Version Control | Coming soon | Complete version control with document history |
Comments & Chat | Not available | Comments and chat functionality |
Collaborator Limits | Unknown | Varies by plan: 1-unlimited collaborators |
Conflict Resolution | Not available | Makes conflicting changes almost impossible |
Winner: Overleaf dominates in collaboration, being a mature platform with proven real-time collaborative features.
Document Management & Templates
Feature | Octree | Overleaf |
---|---|---|
Document Limit | 3 documents (free), unlimited (pro) | Varies by plan |
Templates | Not extensively documented | Hundreds of LaTeX templates |
Import/Export | PDF export, document import | PDF export, multiple import options |
Journal Integration | Not available | Submit feature for direct journal submissions |
External Integrations | Not available | Dropbox, GitHub, Zotero, Mendeley integration |
Winner: Overleaf's extensive template library and journal integrations make it the clear winner for document management.
User Experience & Interface
Aspect | Octree | Overleaf |
---|---|---|
Design Philosophy | Clean, modern, AI-first approach | Traditional split-pane editor with enhancements |
Learning Curve | Designed for LaTeX beginners | User-friendly interface, but LaTeX knowledge helpful |
Editor Types | Standard editor with AI prompting | Visual Editor and Code Editor modes |
Preview | Real-time PDF preview | Automatic compiling with live preview |
Accessibility | Beta stage, limited feedback | Mature platform with extensive documentation |
Winner: Octree appears more beginner-friendly, but Overleaf's maturity and dual editor modes give it versatility.
Pricing Comparison
Octree Pricing
Plan | Price | Features |
---|---|---|
Starter | Free | • Up to 3 documents<br>• Basic AI assistance<br>• PDF export |
Pro | $10/month | • Unlimited edits<br>• Real-time collaboration (coming soon)<br>• Priority support |
Overleaf Pricing
Plan | Price | Features |
---|---|---|
Free | $0 | • Basic features<br>• Limited collaborators<br>• Standard compile time |
Student | $7.41/month | • Student verification required<br>• Enhanced features |
Standard | $16.58/month | • 10 collaborators per project<br>• Full document history<br>• Premium features |
Professional | $33.25/month | • Unlimited collaborators<br>• All premium features<br>• Advanced integrations |
Winner: Octree offers simpler, more affordable pricing, while Overleaf provides more granular options including student discounts.
Strengths and Weaknesses
Octree Strengths
AI-First Approach: Built from the ground up with AI integration
Beginner-Friendly: Designed to eliminate LaTeX complexity
Simple Pricing: Clear, straightforward pricing structure
Modern Interface: Clean, contemporary design
Affordable Pro Tier: Competitive pricing at $10/month
Octree Weaknesses
Beta Stage: Still in development with limited features
No Real Collaboration: Key features still "coming soon"
Limited Templates: No extensive template library
Unproven Track Record: New platform without established user base
Feature Gaps: Missing many standard LaTeX editor features
Overleaf Strengths
Mature Platform: Proven track record with over 20 million users
Comprehensive Features: Full-featured LaTeX environment
Excellent Collaboration: Industry-leading real-time collaboration
Extensive Templates: Hundreds of templates across all disciplines
Strong Integrations: GitHub, Dropbox, reference managers
Educational Resources: Extensive LaTeX learning resources
Overleaf Weaknesses
Higher Cost: More expensive, especially for individual users
Complexity: Can be overwhelming for beginners
AI as Add-on: AI features require separate add-on purchase
Traditional Interface: Less modern than newer competitors
Who Should Choose What?
Choose Octree If:
You're new to LaTeX and want AI guidance
You prioritize simplicity and modern design
You're working on individual projects (for now)
You want affordable access to AI writing assistance
You don't mind using a platform in beta
Choose Overleaf If:
You need proven, reliable collaboration features
You're working in a team or institutional setting
You require extensive template libraries
You need integrations with external tools
You want a mature platform with comprehensive support
The Verdict
While Octree presents an intriguing vision of AI-first LaTeX editing, Overleaf remains the superior choice for most users in 2025. Its maturity, comprehensive feature set, and proven collaboration capabilities make it the safer bet for serious academic work.
However, Octree shows tremendous promise. Its AI-first approach and modern design philosophy could reshape LaTeX editing as it matures. For users willing to embrace a beta platform and primarily working on individual projects, Octree offers an appealing glimpse into the future of academic writing.
Our Recommendation:
For Current Needs: Choose Overleaf for its reliability and comprehensive features
For Future Potential: Keep an eye on Octree as it develops out of beta
For Budget-Conscious Users: Consider Octree's simpler pricing structure
For Teams: Overleaf is currently the only viable option for serious collaboration
The LaTeX editing landscape is evolving rapidly, and both platforms represent exciting directions for the future of academic writing. As AI continues to advance, we expect both platforms to push each other toward even better solutions for researchers worldwide.
Last updated: July 29, 2025
Disclaimer: Octree is currently in beta, and features may change rapidly. Pricing and features mentioned are current as of the publication date and subject to change.